[whatwg] [WA1] Web Apps 1.0: dfn and homonyms and the title attribute
fantasai.lists at inkedblade.net
Wed Jul 6 02:49:41 PDT 2005
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote:
>>You mean, like
>> <dfn title="CSS property">
>>Wouldn't that cause trouble for an automatic indexer? The term should
>>be filed under 'property', not 'CSS'.
> So make the title "property, CSS".
> Or have the indexer do the usual thing, and reverse the word order.
Reversing word order /sometimes/ works for English. It doesn't work
for multi-word terms like "World Wide Web Consortium". It also doesn't
work for languages like French. As for "property, CSS", that is not
the term being defined. The term is either "property" or "CSS property"
to be more precise.
>>>This is done all over the place in the HTML5 spec, fwiw.
>># <dfn id="updateeverything"
>>That 'title' is not a human-targetted string, Ian.
Give me a good reason why the 'title' attribute on <dfn> should not
be a human-targetted string like it is on every other element. Please
also explain why the 'title' given here is not the actual term being
defined but rather an arbitrary (human-readable but nonetheless)
computer-targetted string that you are associating with the term for
The use of computer-targetted strings in 'title' for cross-referencing
forces the span, abbr, code, var, samp, and i elements to use non-human-
targetted strings in /their/ title attributes, despite the attribute
being defined as text for humans to read. What makes this scheme, which
subverts the purpose of the 'title' attribute on so many elements, so
attractive compared to other solutions you have considered?
More information about the whatwg