[whatwg] [WF2] Comments on sections 2.3 -- 2.5
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Jul 11 14:50:41 PDT 2005
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > I guess my point is that for number types or step this would be a very
> > > difficult to follow suggestion and that attempts to follow it are likely
> > > to be pretty buggy...
> > I guess we could remove the suggestion. Would you prefer that?
> It might make more sense to make it clearer that the suggestion is good
> for some purposes but not others (eg the suggestion is great for
> comparing dates, but not numbers).
It's only relevant for numbers. For dates, there is no risk of losing
accuracy (well, unless you have sub-second resolution, which is unlikely).
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg