ian at hixie.ch
Tue Jul 19 06:25:51 PDT 2005
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Kai Hendry wrote:
> I've noticed the datetime demo:
> Which implements input type="datetime"
> Doesn't conform to ISO 8601 of the datetime attribute in WF2.
It doesn't need to. That's the fallback value.
> In the input element is there a need for datetime, datetime-local, date,
> month, week and time, when a single ISO8601 string could perhaps do?
How could a single one do?
> ISO8601 support seems non-trivial. Though this could be a starting
> point: http://delete.me.uk/2005/03/iso8601.html
ISO8601 support is not required; one is only required to support what the
WF2 spec says.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg