[whatwg] text/html conformance checkers and doctype
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Jul 28 10:31:35 PDT 2005
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> > If so, I would answer "no". But I don't have a strong opinion. What's
> > the advantage either way?
> The advantage of allowing case-insensitivity and white space variance is
> that it would be more uniform with HTML4 doctypes. That is, it would be
> easier to write software that deals with both.
You seem to be mixing authoring requirements and implementation
requirements. The implementation requirements for handling <!doctype>
lines in HTML5 will almost certainly be identical to those for treating
comments (I haven't really thought about it yet).
> > (I'd rather address this in WA1 than WF2, anyway.)
> I understand, but WF2 is an extension to HTML4, so it is reasonable to
> expect that white space and case insensitivity is allowed where it is
> allowed in HTML4.
Well again it depends if you are asking about authoring or implementation
requirements. For implementations there are no requirements here.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg