[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Mar 23 04:39:17 PST 2005
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, J. King wrote:
> Personally I'd elect for "url". Even though I prefer the term URI (and
> really dislike the term IRI), "url" is what CSS uses, and there's a lot
> to be said for consistency when authoring documents.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> I think pretty much anybody that could use the feature has some idea what
> "url" means. They don't know that "mailto:user at domain.com" isn't url but that
> doesn't matter a little bit.
Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel
strongly about this.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg