[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"
James Graham
jg307 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Mar 23 04:51:02 PST 2005
Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel
>> strongly about this.
>
>
> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known
> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if
> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.
>
I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast
majority of authors.
--
"But if science you say still sounds too deep,
Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'"
-- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs
More information about the whatwg-whatwg.org
mailing list