[whatwg] [wf2] 2.3. Changes to existing controls
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Mar 21 04:51:16 PST 2005
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, James Graham wrote:
> I think the need to point this out implies that the condition (and the
> wording of the condition) is too complex for most authors to understand
> (and it's clear that no UA will enforce such a condition). Therefore the
> paragraph as it stands benefits no-one and I suggest altering the
> wording, at least.
Ok, how about this:
| The children of a form element must be block-level elements, unless one
| of the ancestors of the form element is an element other than div whose
| content model includes both block- and inline-level content, in which
| case either block-level or inline-level content is allowed (but not
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg