[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

[Ian Hickson]

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, J. King wrote:
> 
> Personally I'd elect for "url".  Even though I prefer the term URI (and 
> really dislike the term IRI), "url" is what CSS uses, and there's a lot 
> to be said for consistency when authoring documents.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> 
> I think pretty much anybody that could use the feature has some idea what
> "url" means. They don't know that "mailto:user at domain.com" isn't url but that
> doesn't matter a little bit.

Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel 
strongly about this.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'