[whatwg] WF2 changes: uri->url, ERROR_* constants dropped; status update
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Mar 23 10:06:45 PST 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
> What are the arguments for dropping the repetition model?
"It's not that useful, and can be done by script anyway."
> FWIW I believe that the repetition model is quite useful, and it would
> be a shame to drop it. Especially combined with data roundtrips
> (replace=values), it enables an elegant way of editing tabular data. A
> data grid is an essential component of any UI widget set, and the
> template based approach in WF2 makes it more powerfull and flexible than
I agree, which is why it's still in the draft.
> There might be point in editorially seperating the repetition model spec
> from the form-related parts of WF2, though. They don't have too many
> dependencies between them, and it might make both specs clearer and more
Which parts would you separate more? All the bits that can be separated
are in the repetition model section already, as far as I can tell.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg