[whatwg] WF2 changes: uri->url, ERROR_* constants dropped; status update
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Mar 23 10:06:45 PST 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
>
> What are the arguments for dropping the repetition model?
"It's not that useful, and can be done by script anyway."
> FWIW I believe that the repetition model is quite useful, and it would
> be a shame to drop it. Especially combined with data roundtrips
> (replace=values), it enables an elegant way of editing tabular data. A
> data grid is an essential component of any UI widget set, and the
> template based approach in WF2 makes it more powerfull and flexible than
> most.
I agree, which is why it's still in the draft.
> There might be point in editorially seperating the repetition model spec
> from the form-related parts of WF2, though. They don't have too many
> dependencies between them, and it might make both specs clearer and more
> focused.
Which parts would you separate more? All the bits that can be separated
are in the repetition model section already, as far as I can tell.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list