[whatwg] Repetition Model (was: WF2 changes: uri->url, ERROR_* constants dropped; status update)
dean at edwards.name
Wed Mar 23 10:36:46 PST 2005
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Dean Edwards wrote:
>>I like the repetition model but maybe it needs more work. But not much
>>more. I feel we are very close to a simple yet useful mechanism. If we
>>did separate it into a separate module then we would have time to tweak
> Can you be more specific? :-)
Er. I was trying to be general. :-)
As I say I'm happy with the repetition model. As it stands, I think it
is workable. I'm not entirely happy with introducing double-barrelled
attribute names (this implies that we've missed a level of abstraction).
But I appreciate that we are trying to work within the existing HTML
rules of containment.
It was my understanding (from reading previous threads) that there were
still some misgivings about the repetition model. As Olav suggests, it
may be complex enough to warrant a separate document. That would give us
some leeway to iron out any crinkles that the model is perceived as having.
I've thought about some changes we could make to the model but to be
honest, I think it may be as good as we can do. Which is pretty good IMHO.
More information about the whatwg