[whatwg] no <noscript> proposal
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian at gmail.com
Mon May 30 11:46:40 PDT 2005
On 5/30/05, Jim Ley <jim.ley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,> > I disagree. The <noscript> element is seldom used for anything else
> > I (and others) have used the <noscript> tag quite a bit for displaying
> > (what alot of people seem to call) "rich media" (for some reason) and
> > having gracefull fall backs. Basically, the code looks something like
> > this:
> > <noscript>
> > <iframe src="...">
> > <a href="..."><img src="..." /></a>
> > </iframe>
> > </noscript>
> > "rich media". If that doesn't work, then we try and use the iframe.
> > If that doesn't work (because the browser is too old) then we try and
> > display the image.
> this isn't what happens in the above case at all, if the script code
> doesn't work, then the fallback content is not displayed, it's only
> displayed if script is not supported at all, script capable user
> agents like Nokias internal browser will still execute your script,
> not manage to display any "rich media", yet the noscript will also not
> be displayed.
Please excuse the confusion. When I said "doesn't work" (in that
turned off (by the user or whoever).
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
Ask the toughest Linux System questions at... http://linuxmanagers.org/
More information about the whatwg