[whatwg] 2.2.1. DOM feature strings
ROBO Design
robodesign at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 08:08:55 PST 2005
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:49:44 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
<fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote:
> Quoting ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com>:
>
>> b) The feature string "XHTML" combined with version string "5.0"
>> is to me not very inspired. Simple reason: XHTML 2. What if they
>> get to XHTML 5? In my opinion, checking for XHTML 5.0 should *not*
>> be available.
>
> Also, feature "XHTML" with version string "2.0" is already taken, see:
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/html.html#ID-1176245063>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anne
I was not saying to use feature "XHTML" with version "2.0". I know it's
taken, that's why I was suggesting to not use "XHTML" and version "5.0"
too.
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
More information about the whatwg
mailing list