[whatwg] rel/rev for <form> ?
robodesign at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 02:50:51 PST 2005
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:30:41 +0200, Mike Dierken <mdierken at hotmail.com>
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:26:33 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov
> <dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As for the "tags" attribute discussion, you guys just invented a
>> "class" attribute.
> Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is mostly for user
> rendering, rather than purely semantic meaning. But it may not be
> or workable to have a 'purely semantic' attribute. Some web crawling
> would likely be able to figure out the semantic equivalence if enough
> used a small enough set of values for similar things.
Dimitri is right. We did so, but with the purpose of defining semantic
meaning, instead of user interface elements.
Yet, I have to add that what we've suggested is (almost) useless. That's
because the WA 1.0 specification already contains something that can solve
what we wanted: profiles .
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
More information about the whatwg