[whatwg] WA 1.0 and WF 2
robodesign at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 08:35:11 PDT 2005
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:08:58 +0300, Lachlan Hunt
<lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote:
> ROBO Design wrote:
> There's no reason to use XHTML 1.0 over HTML 4.01; in fact there are
> many reasons not to. For starters, IE doesn't support XHTML and it
> would be rather ironic to write a spec designed for backwards
> compatibility in IE, using a language it doesn't even support.
> See this, and search google, for more information about XHTML vs HTML.
I have experience and I believe I know the differences between XHTML 1.0
and HTML 4. Yet, I don't believe I know *all* of them. In fact, I learned
some things from that article. Thanks.
Ummm... it still doesn't answer my question: why?
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
More information about the whatwg