[whatwg] [wf2] repeat-min and max

J. King jking at dark-phantasy.com
Fri Apr 7 08:33:02 PDT 2006

On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:44:44 -0300, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote:

> On Apr 7, 2006, at 17:16, J. King wrote:
>> Still, whether 0 is a valid value or not is moot: invalid values are  
>> assumed to be zero, so it all functionally adds up to the same thing.
> It is moot for browsers. It isn't for conformance checkers.

Of course.  I have no idea why that didn't occur to me. :(

J. King

More information about the whatwg mailing list