[whatwg] Registering protocol handlers

Christian Biesinger cbiesinger at web.de
Mon Apr 24 15:08:48 PDT 2006

Ben Goodger wrote:
>> Well. What I would _like_ is not something you will like, I suspect...
>> What I would like is the specification of registerContentHandler to be
>> removed.
> By this do you mean that browsers like Firefox, Safari, Opera, etc
> should not pursue implementation of the core functionality?
> Or are you saying that a browser should provide an implementation
> first, and then specify it?

Hm... thinking about this, probably the second. Seeing how the handler 
selection works would be something that may well change my opinion on 
some of my comments. Still not sure how good a spec can be w/o referring 
to any UI, but maybe I can be convinced there too.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4762 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060425/8a6f57f9/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the whatwg mailing list