[whatwg] Registering protocol handlers
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Apr 26 17:49:59 PDT 2006
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> > The spec is just there to make sure that if the page _does_ use the
> > feature, it can do so in a way that will lead to predictable _server
> > side_ results, independent of the user agent used.
> OK. I still think that pages would like to know for what content exactly
> their registered handler will be used ...
That isn't really how the Web works...
> > I'm not sure what you're saying here. The API is just a way to say "I
> > can handle this type", it's not a way of saying "I want to handle all
> > content of this type". Is the spec misleading about this? Let me know
> > if I can reword something to reduce the confusion here.
> I think it is. Consider this sentence:
> "Analogously, the registerContentHandler() method allows Web sites to
> register themselves as handlers for content in a particular MIME type."
> To me that sounds like "wants to handle (all) content of that type". I
> suppose the next sentence is trying to clarify this. But if that's not
> the meaning, I think the sentence should be clarified, although I can't
> think of a good wording at the moment.
Ok, changed it to "register themselves as possible handlers". Is that
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg