[whatwg] Dynamic content accessibility in HTML today
Anne van Kesteren
fora at annevankesteren.nl
Mon Aug 14 06:48:06 PDT 2006
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:36:40 -0700, James Graham <jg307 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> But XBL works with ~0 assistive technologies and is presumably going to
> be complex to implement properly. Whilst, in general, I agree that
> having elements used in the correct way to provide semantic information
> is desirable, I think that adopting a technology that is already
> implemented and proven to solve real problems is a better approach than
> waiting on a complex future specification to be finished and implemented.
So a while ago I posted
http://annevankesteren.nl/2006/06/accessibility-ideas some of my thoughts
regarding role=""... Basically, I don't really see authors taking extra
steps to make things accessible. Accessibility should just be an integral
part of the language, otherwise I don't think it will work. For authors it
will seem that without role="" their custom widgets will work so there's
no real benefit in adding it unless you work for some big company that
hires a few "accessibility experts" who tell you to add it.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list