[whatwg] Select conformance
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 15 01:03:04 PDT 2006
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> I'm pretty sure we've been through this before -- I think it shouldn't
> be, ratemy*.com thinks it should be, and there are more of those sites
> than there are of me. :-) (Why they don't just use a set of numbered
> have no idea.)
Yeah I don't get that either.
I agree with your points over what should and shouldn't be, but I think we
have to basically allow all of them, including those you think we
shouldn't, because there might be some rare use cases where they make
sense. Generally, as noted several times today, I'm against banning things
that aren't very clearly bad.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg