[whatwg] [wf2] repeat-min and max
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 15 02:38:09 PDT 2006
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Section 3.4.
> "The repeat-min attribute specifies the number of repetition blocks that
> the remove button type will ensure are present each time a block is
> removed. Its value must be a positive integer (one or more digits 0-9
> interpreted as a base ten number). If the attribute is omitted or if it
> has an invalid value then it is treated as if its value was zero."
> Is zero intentionally excluded from the permissible values? Wouldn't it
> be more natural to spec the integer to be non-negative?
Bah. Pedant. :-P Fixed.
> "These two attributes have no effect on the repetition model when
> present on elements that do not have a repeat attribute with the value
> set to template."
> Is it conforming for these attributes to appear on elements that do not
> have the repeat attribute (with any value; assuming that occurrence with
> repeat set to an integer is conforming)?
You asked that in another mail. :-) The spec doesn't say it's
non-conforming, so yes, it's conforming for all these attributes to be on
any element, regardless of the other attributes. But they don't have any
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg