[whatwg] Editorial: Tag omission

Ian Hickson ian at hixie.ch
Fri Dec 1 08:39:23 PST 2006

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> This sentence:
>   However, a start tag must never be omitted if the element
>   to which it belongs is immediately preceeded by another
>   element with the same name, whose end tag has been omitted.
> AFAICT, this only applies to <colgroup>. Why not move this requirement 
> to the <colgroup> entry?


> All entries on start tags mention "the head element", should be replaced 
> with the relevant entry's element instead.


> The </colgroup> entry has a markup error (s/<pan>/<span>/).


Also there was duplication of the <thead> tag omission. Removed the first one.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

More information about the whatwg mailing list