[whatwg] Editorial: Tag omission
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Dec 1 08:39:23 PST 2006
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> This sentence:
> However, a start tag must never be omitted if the element
> to which it belongs is immediately preceeded by another
> element with the same name, whose end tag has been omitted.
> AFAICT, this only applies to <colgroup>. Why not move this requirement
> to the <colgroup> entry?
> All entries on start tags mention "the head element", should be replaced
> with the relevant entry's element instead.
> The </colgroup> entry has a markup error (s/<pan>/<span>/).
Also there was duplication of the <thead> tag omission. Removed the first one.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg