[whatwg] several messages about XML syntax and HTML5
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 03:30:15 PST 2006
Michel Fortin wrote:
>> But I think allowing attributes with no meaning to
>> validate will just reenforce the idea that they are
>> meaningful. If you use them, fine, but you'll have
>> a validation error there that will warn you that this
>> is no HTML.
How about the validator be required to present an informational note, or
even a warning, but not flag as an *error*? That addresses your concern as
it would reinforce the idea that it is meaningless.
More information about the whatwg