[whatwg] Provding Better Tools (was: Re: 18.104.22.168: trailing slash and atheism)
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 04:14:19 PST 2006
>> As someone in the process of implementing a HTML5
>> parser from the spec, my _only_ complaint so far is
>> that there aren't (yet) any testcases. The spec is
>> very clearly written and structured in such a way
>> that it can be converted almost directly to code
>> (of course, not all implementers will want to use
>> the exact architecture this implies).
And you are smarter than most. ;-) Seriously. For one you are here on this
Consider: intelligence is definitely not a prerequiste for ambition.
You should have seen some of the components I reviewed...
>> The spec shouldn't contain references to implementations.
>> However the wiki should contain such a list (see
Then minimally the spec should at least contain (something like):
"Implementors SHOULD NOT use string concatonation and
SHOULD use one of the HTML5 components listed here:
More information about the whatwg