[whatwg] <input type="text" accept="">
L. David Baron
dbaron at dbaron.org
Thu Jun 8 18:02:04 PDT 2006
On Friday 2006-06-09 00:42 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, L. David Baron wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't see why the same attribute _shouldn't_ be used to determine
> > > the type of data to allow, and whether to do spell checking or not.
> > > After all, whether to spell-check is directly related to what kind of
> > > data it is.
> >
> > This sounds a lot like <object>, which allowed for tons of features but
> > didn't specify them precisely. Are you planning to specify exactly what
> > the semantics of every MIME type are for all of these features?
>
> No, because I don't know what those are, and want to allow for browser
> vendors to increase their feature set without having to have the spec
> updated each time.
>
> It doesn't seem like this is an area that requires interoperability (who
> cares if one browser auto-indents and another colours and spell-checks,
> other than the user of each browser?).
The original use case, as I understand it, was roughly "authors want to
disable spell checking on some textareas". Is the reason that they want
to disable spellchecking only that the contents are not "text/plain"? I
doubt it. Doing what you propose, especially if it is extended to other
features, will just encourage authors to use incorrect MIME types to get
particular side-effects in particular user agents.
It seems more likely to be that the textarea is expected to contain a
particular type of text, such as abbreviations or some form of code.
The content is unlikely to have an assigned MIME type. I suppose one
could be made up, but that would presumably disable everything a UA did
on the basis of the contents, which wouldn't necessarily be appropriate.
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060608/0842165a/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list