[whatwg] <progress> draft
whatwg at cycloid.f9.co.uk
Tue Mar 28 04:02:26 PST 2006
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Ric Hardacre wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>> The only difference between meter and progress is the potential for
>>>> progress to be dynamic.
>>> That's a big difference. It means the UI for one has to show that it
>>> is static, and the UI for the other has to show that it should "end".
>> which is laudable, and makes sense, but each will be updatable on the
>> fly. a meter has to have this ability, e.g. allowing CNN to show the
>> election votes cast on their home page, updated asynchronously.
> Sure, but they have different meanings. Progress bars are intended to
> reach 100% unless cancelled; vote counts are not. In Mac OS, and many
> Gnome and KDE themes, <progress> will have an animated appearance by
> default; <meter> will not.
you mean the progress bars that just show a bar bouncing back and forth
or scrolling across and therefore not actually showing the amount of
More information about the whatwg