[whatwg] <progress> draft

[James Graham]

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, James Graham wrote:
>> +1
>> This seems to be a case where "there should be one, and preferably 
>> only one, obvious way to do it" holds.
> 
> Well, there are two ways -- update the textContent, and update the 
> attribute. But for the attribute, there's only one syntax. We could remove 
> the attribute as well, and force authors to use textContent, though...

AFAICT, the design without a value attribute rocks. If only the whole 
spec could make fallbak content such an integral part of the design...