[whatwg] <progress> draft
jg307 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Mar 28 13:22:43 PST 2006
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, James Graham wrote:
>> This seems to be a case where "there should be one, and preferably
>> only one, obvious way to do it" holds.
> Well, there are two ways -- update the textContent, and update the
> attribute. But for the attribute, there's only one syntax. We could remove
> the attribute as well, and force authors to use textContent, though...
AFAICT, the design without a value attribute rocks. If only the whole
spec could make fallbak content such an integral part of the design...
More information about the whatwg