[whatwg] <img> element comments
Anne van Kesteren
fora at annevankesteren.nl
Fri Nov 3 05:38:37 PST 2006
Some points:
* I think the section on the <img> element should also define 'new
Image([width [, height]])' which effectively returns an HTMLImageElement
object in current browsers.
* It should probably mention 'img.src = foo' (that loading directly
starts). I thought that 'img.setAttribute("src", foo)' even did different
things in browsers (when the element is not yet inserted into the
document) so reflect might not be accurate.
* I would also suggest to put "If the src attribute is omitted, there is
no alternative image representation." after the last statement on the alt
attribute.
* Regarding the alt attribute, wouldn't it make sense to just allow it to
be omitted? In terms of meaning it seems the same. On the other hand, it
probably shows the difference between people who thought of the
alternative representation and people that haven't.
* I think it would also make sense to show some more examples for the alt
attribute. http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/alt.html might be too large
to be included in the specification, but guidelines to that effect would
be more than welcome.
* The height and width attributes as defined are completely
presentational. I don't really see any value in keeping them. Now I
suppose they have to be supported anyway, but so does <body bgcolor="">.
* Perhaps we can allow content for XML documents?
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list