[whatwg] The problems with namespaces in text/html (Was: MathML-in-HTML5)
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Nov 3 21:51:16 PST 2006
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dolphinling wrote:
> > I'm not saying don't add MathML to HTML. I'm saying don't add
> > namespace syntax to HTML.
> Is this feasible? As much as I'd like this for ease of use, at some
> point or other when enough things have been added to html, there will be
> conflicts. Namespaces seem like the only way to avoid those conflicts,
> and there needs to be some way of representing those namespaces.
Since we can control what becomes valid HTML, yes, I think it's feasible.
> > Some pages even have completely bogus namespaces on the root <html>
> > element, which would make the entire page screw up. Even worse, Office
> > HTML, of which there is a LOT on the Web, uses namespaces in a way to
> > trigger IE to do one thing, but relies on the other browsers *not*
> > handling the namespaces to make sure it all works everywhere. (Like I
> > said earlier, I've worked with one browser vendor who tried
> > implementing this namespace thing before, and had to back out because
> > it broke real content in pretty fundamental ways.)
> Is the list of bogus namespaces relatively confined? Would it be
> technically feasible to enumerate the worst ones and say "ignore these"?
The list is pretty big, actually. It's quite depressing.
> Are there any reasons besides ease of use and misuse in tag-soup content
> that XML's namespace syntax shouldn't be added to HTML?
I can't think of any other reasons off-hand, no. But those reasons are so
big that I find it difficult to think of anything but those problems when
I consider namespaces, so it might just be that I'm not thinking clearly
enough to see the other problems.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg