[whatwg] hash Attribute
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Nov 9 17:04:49 PST 2006
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > If the idea is that UAs that implement this would stop you from using the
> > file if the checksum didn't match, then this would just cause users to use
> > browsers _without_ this feature to download files, since those browsers
> > wouldn't complain about data corruption. "It works when I use IE to download
> > the file but when I use Camari, it says 'checksum error'."
>
> Hopefully, it would instead say:
>
> "The file you have downloaded has been corrupted or tampered with."
"It works when I use IE but when I use Camari, it says that the file has
been corrupted." "Oh man, I'm not using Camari then! I don't need my music
to get corrupted!"
> [Delete File] [Keep Unsafe File]
"Keep Unsafe File" would make the feature as useless as SSL certificates
are today.
> It might even just delete it without asking you. After all, you haven't
> actually got the file you wanted - or that the person linking wanted you
> to have. If they didn't want this behaviour, they wouldn't have used a
> URL with a hash.
Exactly. But then you're back to the "it works in the older browser"
problem.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list