[whatwg] Tim BL's HTML WG announcement and WHAT WG
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
Mon Oct 30 01:56:19 PST 2006
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of
> WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already.
That would be excellent.
Perhaps I was overly worried, because I couldn't tell from the
announcement where this is going.
>>> Or will the WHAT WG activities continue with an endorsement from
>>> the W3C?
>
> I would be very surprised. As Tim notes, the WHATWG doesn't have
> what he calls "accountability measures" (by which I think he means
> a process with more of the checks and balances that are found in
> W3C's), which would make it hard for W3C to endorse anything WHATWG
> have yet to do.
I don't expect the W3C to endorse the WHAT WG itself. What I meant to
ask if the WHAT WG spec drafts continue to be worked on under the
banner of the W3C.
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
More information about the whatwg
mailing list