[whatwg] HTLM5 - Addressing the Password Craze?
anders.rundgren at telia.com
Wed Sep 6 23:16:35 PDT 2006
As you probably have noticed, practically every site offers a login.for their
members, customers, citizens etc. etc.
There are two problems here.
1. User-id/password management has become a real nuisance. Once this was
an issue for computer professionals only, now it affects everyone from children
2. There are other and better authentication methods available that become hard
to migrate to without making life hard for end-users by asking them to use another
login method. The site has no way of detecting the user's options.
It appears, that it may be possible to add some kind of negotiation/option
elements at the HTML level, that if supported by the underlying system could
offer a standardized and potentially more powerful version of the password
caches or external login form "hijacker software" that we currently use.
Tentative functionality for the AHE (Authentication Helper Extension):
- Find out if the AHE is installed/available
- If the AHE is available, find out if the site in question is in the list
- If in the list, put out a dialog box giving the user an option to login, decline
or manually enter login information.
- If the site so requests, the user's authentication options (in case form based
authentication was used) can be transferred during login, giving the site an
option to ask/require the user to upgrade their authentication. This could
involve anything from digest-authentication to certificates. The latter
current lacks a decent provision method but there is some work
going on in this area as well. MS CardSpaces is also an option.
- The authentication stuff would be possible to store in an USB token or
even better in a mobile phone. This is of course outside of HTML5
but will be natural to support within 3-5 years from now.
- The scheme would (if properly implemented) be able to thwart phishing
since a user-id/password (or other auth solution) could be tied to a
SSL root + host name (or even better host domain).
In essence the desired result is a portable (mobile) multi-site authentication
support mechanism that should not only make the web easier, but also
long-term considerably more secure.
The other option is addressing this problem at the transport level but I think
form-based authentication is a better entrance point since it is already in place.
There is no problem [at all] of having a mechanism [in the proposed scheme]
that switches from form-based authentication to transport-level authentication
like using TLS-client-certificates, while the opposite is impossible.
More information about the whatwg