[whatwg] on codecs in a 'video' tag.
bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com
Mon Apr 2 14:55:17 PDT 2007
Maik Merten wrote:
> Well, for text browsers or on platforms that don't have the processing
> juice to decode it (then they couldn't decode MPEG4 whatever-part
> either). I'd say that are platforms that usually don't even have feature
> complete browsers anyway.
display descriptions and closed captions. There's no reason save
programmer time and interest why a pure text browser couldn't implement
<video/> without the video and audio.
More information about the whatwg