[whatwg] HTTP's Referer and Set-Cookie2 headers
mart at degeneration.co.uk
Tue Apr 17 11:47:57 PDT 2007
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
> May I suggest that you also allow the DOM "referrer" attribute to match
> a HTTP "Referrer" header if one is present, and fall back to the
> "Referer" header otherwise. This provides for HTML 5 compliant UAs to be
> forwards compatible with a potential future HTTP spec that fixes the typo.
I think it would be the responsibility of that hypothetical future HTTP
spec to describe backwards-compatibility requirements. Having everything
that depends on HTTP have language about handling a possible future
extension of HTTP that doesn't even exist is likely to result in lots of
Or is there actually a new version of HTTP under discussion somewhere
that I've missed?
More information about the whatwg