[whatwg] noscript Content Model

[Ian Hickson]

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > > So, given that it already states the conforming content model is the same
> > > as that of its parent element, I don't see how that is an additional
> > > restriction at all.
> > 
> > Consider:
> > 
> >    <aside>
> >      <noscript>
> >        <em>Text</em>
> >      </noscript>
> >      <noscript>
> >        <p>Text</p>
> >      </noscript>
> >    </aside>
> 
> I see.  How about including that example in the spec and rephrasing first
> additional requirement like this:
> 
> * Replacing each noscript element with its child elements must not
>   cause the document to become non-conforming.

I think this is all covered now by the new "transparent" text. Do you 
agree? I do think we'll still have to add examples, but I'm going to wait 
for now because I expect to do a pass one day adding examples everywhere.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'