[whatwg] HTML5 DOCTYPE
David Håsäther
hasather at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 05:10:08 PST 2007
Yuhong Bao wrote:
> I agree that the HTML5 DOCTYPE should be optional
Note that this is only the case for the XML serialization.
> but how about expanding it to the full thing like the HTML 4.01 DOCTYPE?
As the FAQ explains[1] the only reason for the inclusion of the
DOCTYPE declaration in the spec is to trigger standards mode in
browsers, and <!doctype html> does just that. Using the full form
would only waste bytes as browsers don't use that information anyway.
[1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What_will_the_DOCTYPE_be.3F
--
David Håsäther
More information about the whatwg
mailing list