[whatwg] Removal of Ogg is *preposterous*
jeffm at iglou.com
Wed Dec 12 13:34:44 PST 2007
David Hyatt wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>> David Hyatt wrote:
>>> Fear of submarine patents is only one reason Apple is not interested
>>> in Theora. There are several other reasons. H.264 is a technically
>>> superior solution to Theora. Ignoring IP issues, there would be no
>>> reason to pick Theora over H.264. Everyone wants an open freely
>>> implementable codec, but it doesn't follow that Theora should
>>> automatically be that codec. About the only argument I've heard in
>>> favor of Theora is that "it's open", but that is an argument based
>>> purely on IP and not on technical merits.
>> Openness is a prerequisite. Technical adequacy is a prerequisite. The
>> technically best solution is not a prerequisite. In case it isn't
>> obvious yet, an open, adequate format is preferred over a better
>> proprietary one.
> I don't think that is obvious at all,
I think its extremely obvious and critically important to more and more
end-users. Apple would do well to consider this issue in more depth.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the whatwg