[whatwg] Removal of Ogg is *preposterous*
giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl
Wed Dec 12 15:58:29 PST 2007
Dnia 12-12-2007, Śr o godzinie 00:21 -0500, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
> Look, guys. I don't think I've explained myself well, partly because I've
> come on too strong. There is no evidence of malice. There's also no
> evidence of profiteering. There *is* evidence of immorality, if you define
> spreading falsehoods as immoral (see "Ogg is proprietary" comment). The rest
> of the discussion is basically a disagreement on how risky it would be to
> implement Ogg on browsers. Some of us don't feel it's risky, others feel
> it's too risky to even consider (I understand -- billions of dollars may be
> at stake).
And both threads are pointless and irrelevant.
More information about the whatwg