[whatwg] Xiph.Org Statement Regarding the HTML5 Draft and the Ogg Codec Set
foolistbar at googlemail.com
Thu Dec 13 13:53:05 PST 2007
On 13 Dec 2007, at 21:29, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
>> It would make no sense to require a different baseline audio codec
>> for the non-sfx use case for <audio> than was required for <video>.)
> Of course it would make sense. People use their Web pages to put up
> music all
> the time, much more often than for sound FX. They aren't gonna
> upload files
> tens of megabytes in size for each song!
Huh? I think you've misunderstood what you're quoting, i.e., there
will be two audio codecs supported for <audio>:
- PCM in WAVE.
- Whatever is chosen for <video>.
More information about the whatwg