[whatwg] HTML5 and URI Templates
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Dec 17 06:07:38 PST 2007
Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:16:17 +0100, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> For the record: I totally disagree. It's not the job of the URI and
>> IRI RFCs to describe how a user agent has to handle things that do not
>> conform to the RFC3986/3987 syntax.
> Why not?
> The HTML4 WG had this position about HTML as well. This position is what
> makes interoperability suffer, browser vendors having to spend lots of
> resources reverse engineering each other, and the resulting de facto
> error handling being suboptimal (hard to make extensions, for instance).
Because URIs are just a syntactical construct. If there are common
requirements for *user agents* how to handle things that aren't URIs but
should have been, specify them for these user agents. For instance, why
should RDF or XMLNS care about what *browsers* do with broken identifiers?
More information about the whatwg