[whatwg] Possible alternative to specifying a codec for the <video> tag
dgerard at gmail.com
Sun Dec 23 05:08:21 PST 2007
On 23/12/2007, Robert (Jamie) Munro <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
> How could we do that? The codec is usually a relatively small download
> download compared to the video itself. If we could suggest a way for
> codecs to be provided alongside the videos by the content providers,
> this /may/ be a way forward. Hypothetically, you could do video by
> canvas, but good performance is unlikely.
Arbitrary executable downloads didn't work out well with ActiveX, and
"Download codec to view this!" is already a vector for malware.
> However, now that Java is free, Java applets could provide a solution.
> There is already a free Ogg Vorbis/Theora java applet here:
> Java is available for all the major browsers and already installed on
> many small devices.
Wikimedia sites use this now. It's not a great solution (click, wait a
minute with a hung browser application while Java loads), but it's a
kludge we consider slightly better than nothing.
As soon as Firefox 3 is out I strongly suspect we'll be putting Ogg
stick-in-the-mud browsers like Safari to tell the reader how much they
suck. Nokia and Apple can then decide whether they want to support the
content or not.
More information about the whatwg