[whatwg] The m element

Lachlan Hunt lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au
Tue Feb 6 14:45:38 PST 2007

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> I fail to see how this is different from an em element... (very loose and abused 
> semantics, but I dont see how adding a new element to mess up is helpful)

<em> is for emphasis, <m> is not.  They have very different meanings.

>> <zcorpan> one reason might be to highlight search terms, another may
>> be to mark errors in the document, or things you should remember
>> specifically
>> <csarven> in those cases the marked text has no extra meaning other
>> then how it would be viewed or interpreted. "highlighting does not
>> change the reading of the text..."

That's right, whereas <em> does change the meaning of the text.

<m> is for highlighting text that is of some interest to the reader, but 
it does not alter the meaning of the text itself.

Lachlan Hunt

More information about the whatwg mailing list