mikko.rantalainen at peda.net
Fri Feb 9 05:52:42 PST 2007
David Latapie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:58:35 +0200, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
>> ignore and is usually orthogonal to the rest of the content. <small>
>> is something you usually skip but you must be aware of the content
>> (e.g. a copyright or license boilerplate) - the key here is that the
>> content is often repeated but if you have read it *once*, then you
>> may skip it later.
> So, if I understanf you correctly, <small> is short for "important
> legalse-like SMALL-print" and not just "SMALL-text">, right?
That's pretty much what the current WHATWG spec says:
The latest HTML specification of small element
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/graphics.html#h-15.2.1) only says
"15.2.1 Font style elements: the TT, I, B, BIG, SMALL, STRIKE, S, and U
elements" and "SMALL: Renders text in a 'small' font". So either <small>
has no semantics at all (and should be dropped) or it has semantics
defined by WHATWG (which seems to describe the current usage in the wild).
More information about the whatwg