[whatwg] The m element
david at empyree.org
Fri Feb 9 16:06:31 PST 2007
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:36:25 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> <m> marks a point of interest for future reference, it does not
> denote importance. Everyone seems to be focussing on the definition
> of highlight meaning emphasis as their argument that it is the same
> as <em> and/or <strong>. However, it's the definition of mark ,
> in particular "to identify an item for future reference", that is
> most relevant, and neither <em> nor <strong> fulfil that purpose.
Of Google cache highlighting has anything to do with future reference?
Or is the Google cache highlighting example a wrong one?
More information about the whatwg