[whatwg] The m element

David Latapie david at empyree.org
Fri Feb 9 16:06:31 PST 2007

On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:36:25 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> <m> marks a point of interest for future reference, it does not 
> denote importance.  Everyone seems to be focussing on the definition 
> of highlight meaning emphasis as their argument that it is the same 
> as <em> and/or <strong>.  However, it's the definition of mark [1], 
> in particular "to identify an item for future reference", that is 
> most relevant, and neither <em> nor <strong> fulfil that purpose.

Of Google cache highlighting has anything to do with future reference? 
Or is the Google cache highlighting example a wrong one?
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Français)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)

More information about the whatwg mailing list