[whatwg] W3C compatibility
bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 12 04:09:03 PST 2007
Henri Sivonen wrote:
> The right way to go about this is to invent new names for the
> incompatible elements/attributes or to abstain from specifying
> incompatible stuff in the first place.
I agree 100%.
> The practical alternative is to refuse to implement specs that
> require legacy-incompatible changes to processing models.
For browsers which have already implemented XHTML1, that seems to
require implementing neither XHTML2-in-the-XHTML1-namespace nor XHTML5
(cf. Anne's reply).
> "Only with doctype sniffing" should be read as "No".
I suspect the only thing with a hope of dissuading UAs from doctype
sniffing is sternly telling them that they SHOULD implement doctype
More information about the whatwg