[whatwg] Thoughts on the <hi> element (formerly the <m> element).
hasather at gmail.com
Sun Feb 18 12:46:07 PST 2007
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:21:29 +0100, Elliotte Harold
<elharo at metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> FWIW, I think <hi> is a very confusing name. I keep thinking of some
>> header until I read it's supposed to replace the <m> element. If this
>> element is needed <m> is definitely a better name.
> One objection seems to be to the single character name. Maybe ma or mark
> instead of hi?
The problem I have with both mark and hi(light) as names is that they both
are verbs in this context. It sounds more like a command to the browser:
"mark this", "hilight that", instead of being descriptive.
More information about the whatwg