[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

Anne van Kesteren annevk at opera.com
Tue Jan 9 13:43:09 PST 2007

On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:19:43 +0100, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote:
> Compare with: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1137799947&count=1

You know, you're probably right. I'm just not there yet.

To be fair, the reason we have <em> and <strong> there in Opera is exactly  
because we got feedback from people saying they didn't want "non-semantic  
output" (we did <i> and <b> originally). It's a crazy world.

Anne van Kesteren

More information about the whatwg mailing list