[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

Anne van Kesteren annevk at opera.com
Fri Jan 12 04:18:37 PST 2007

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:16:04 +0100, Spartanicus  
<spartanicus.3 at ntlworld.ie> wrote:
> CSS table layouts share all of the many drawbacks of HTML table layouts,
> except for the false semantics (one of the least significant issues
> IMO).

I agree, CSS needs something like the XUL flexible box model.

> Afaics this is off topic for this list, so I'm not going to add further
> to this thread spin off.

It prolly is, oh well.

Anne van Kesteren

More information about the whatwg mailing list