[whatwg] <cite> versus |cite|
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 16 03:54:38 PST 2007
Mathew Raymond wrote:
> Well, first of all, it doesn't cover cases without hyperlinks:
> | <p><q>Blah</q>, said Baz</p>
Anne van Kesteren responded:
> I don't think that case is very interesting.
Well, even without a URI, user agents could do a crude lookup on the
contents of the cite element. For example, a user agent presented with
metadata as crass as <cite>Hamlet, I.ii</cite> could query Google:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=I.ii+intitle%3AHamlet
and retrieve
http://www.bartleby.com/70/4212
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
More information about the whatwg
mailing list