[whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2
Leigh.Klotz at xerox.com
Tue Jan 23 11:02:56 PST 2007
That's reassuring. So let's all take a look at Dave's proposals in that
light -- an HTML enhancement that maps more directly onto the concepts
that have been in the XForms Rec since 2003.
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk at opera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:58 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh; Matthew Raymond; Dave Raggett
Cc: WHAT WG List; www-forms at w3.org; public-appformats at w3.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:51:55 -0500, Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz at xerox.com>
> Or what makes you want to cannibalize an existing W3C Recommendation
> which predates the formation of WHAT-WG?
I don't think most people in the WHATWG see it as a XForms versus Web
Forms 2 "match" or something. I don't really believe that to be the case
WHATWG is a lot more about incrementally enhancing HTML in a way that it
remains compatible with content that is out there.
Anne van Kesteren
More information about the whatwg