[whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Jan 25 10:21:35 PST 2007
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, James Graham wrote:
> Sorry, was I reading the same document as you? I saw a list of technical
> problems that Apple and Opera identified...
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> You did see some technical objections that Opera raised, but please
> check to see any comments Opera made in the preceeding years and you
> will not see these issues raised. [...]
Could I please ask that the WHATWG list be taken off the distribution
list for this discussion? I'm very happy to see technical issues discussed
here, and am very happy to see the pros and cons of various features be
discussed, but arguing over who should be working with whom is not helping
What would be really useful from the XForms-Tiny viewpoint is if someone
could write a summary of the spec for XForms-Tiny. Dave tells me that he
is working on one. If this work in progress could be made public, it would
be a great help. Some of the ideas in the XForms-Tiny examples look
interesting, but without seeing the overall model they really are not
clear enough to use as feedback on the Web Forms 2 W3C working draft.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg